Personal Immigration
Business Immigration
About Us
LATEST NEWS:
Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers Grounds of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014 Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014 Transferring ILR visa to a Biometric Residence Permit New Graduate Visa route for international students announced by Home Office Immigration Rules designed to keep families together cause families to be separated UK government announces 3 year right to remain for EU citizens following no-deal Brexit Changes to the Business, Investment & Talent Categories What is the Tier 2 Minimum Salary Requirement? UK backtracks on decision to end free movement after Brexit

Please filter our resources:

LOCATION: Home » Knowledge Centre » Asylum And Human Rights Advice London

KNOWLEDGE
CENTRE

Section 3C Explained: A Flowchart for Human Rights Applications
By Richmond Chambers

As direct access barristers working at Richmond Chambers, we have had countless lay clients approach us with one question: am I protected by section 3C of the Immigration Act 1971?  This can at times be a complicated question, particularly when the Home Office...

 guidance on section 3C appears to be at odds with the natural interpretation of statute, an example of which can be found here. Section 3C of the Immigration Act 1971 Explained At a time when the Home Office’s hostile environment towards those without...

Remedy for removal following certification is to be returned
By Voratida Sangchant

In XB v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 2557 (Admin) the claimant successfully challenged the Secretary of State’s certification of her fresh claim for asylum as being clearly unfounded....

 The claimant had, by this point, already been removed from the UK, such that the learned judge directed the Secretary of State to ensure that the claimant re-enter the UK so that she could attend her appeal.FACTS

Judgment in Virabyan v. Armenia handed down by European Court of Human Rights
By Richmond Chambers

In its recent judgment in the case of Virabyan v. Armenia (Application no. 40094/05), the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found Armenia to have breached articles 3, 6 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights...

 (ECHR).   Paul Richmond of Richmond Chambers, instructed by the Kurdish Human Rights Project, drafted both the initial application to the European Court and the response to the submission of the government of Armenia.

Court clarifies meaning of 'act of persecution'
By Richmond Chambers

The Court of Justice of the European Union has given an Opinion on what constitutes an 'act of persecution' for the purposes of recognition of refugee status for asylum seekers.

 The Court of Justice of the European Union has given an Opinion on what constitutes an 'act of persecution' for the purposes of recognition of refugee status for asylum seekers.

DOWNLOAD OUR
BROCHURE

Expert advice & representation from immigration barristers that you can rely on.

Google+ - Five Stars

Read the 300+ five out of five star Google reviews of our immigration barristers.

More
AWARDS