Personal Immigration
Business Immigration
About Us
LATEST NEWS:
Tier 1 Investor Visa Route Suspended - What's Changing And Why? How to interpret decisions on permission to appeal Unilateral Article 50 revocation: Advocate General’s Opinion in Case C-621/18 Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union New Vacancy: Immigration Legal Associates EEA National & Family Member Success Stories Tier 1 (Entrepreneur): Specified evidence and missing documents New proposal suggests ID cards to control immigration Dishonesty and deception in immigration cases How to make a valid immigration application Brexit: The Future for Turkish Businesspersons and Workers

Please filter our resources:

LOCATION: Home » Knowledge Centre » Asylum And Human Rights Advice London

KNOWLEDGE
CENTRE

Section 3C Explained: A Flowchart for Human Rights Applications
By Richmond Chambers

As direct access barristers working at Richmond Chambers, we have had countless lay clients approach us with one question: am I protected by section 3C of the Immigration Act 1971?  This can at times be a complicated question, particularly when the Home Office...

 guidance on section 3C appears to be at odds with the natural interpretation of statute, an example of which can be found here. Section 3C of the Immigration Act 1971 Explained At a time when the Home Office’s hostile environment towards those without...

Remedy for removal following certification is to be returned
By Voratida Sangchant

In XB v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 2557 (Admin) the claimant successfully challenged the Secretary of State’s certification of her fresh claim for asylum as being clearly unfounded....

 The claimant had, by this point, already been removed from the UK, such that the learned judge directed the Secretary of State to ensure that the claimant re-enter the UK so that she could attend her appeal.FACTS

Judgment in Virabyan v. Armenia handed down by European Court of Human Rights
By Richmond Chambers

In its recent judgment in the case of Virabyan v. Armenia (Application no. 40094/05), the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found Armenia to have breached articles 3, 6 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights...

 (ECHR).   Paul Richmond of Richmond Chambers, instructed by the Kurdish Human Rights Project, drafted both the initial application to the European Court and the response to the submission of the government of Armenia.

Court clarifies meaning of 'act of persecution'
By Richmond Chambers

The Court of Justice of the European Union has given an Opinion on what constitutes an 'act of persecution' for the purposes of recognition of refugee status for asylum seekers.

 The Court of Justice of the European Union has given an Opinion on what constitutes an 'act of persecution' for the purposes of recognition of refugee status for asylum seekers.

DOWNLOAD OUR
BROCHURE

Expert advice & representation from immigration barristers that you can rely on.

Google+ - Five Stars

Read our 200+ five out of five star Google+ reviews from our previous clients.

More
AWARDS